|
|||||||||||||||
News
Sudanese Refugees in Israel Sudanese survivors of genocide from the Darfur region, and of a brutal civil war in South Sudan, who subsequently fled to Israel, are being detained for extended periods of time. They are denied the right to seek asylum. Background on the Refugees Arriving in Israel Sudan has been in a state of civil war for many years, with long-running conflicts between various ethnic groups. Since 1983, a civil war between North and South Sudan has displaced more than 4 million southerners and has resulted in the death of 1.9 million people. Unable to grow food or earn money to feed themselves, malnutrition and starvation became widespread. Prof. Yehuda Bauer, a leading scholar on the Holocaust, recently characterized the South Sudanese as suffering from genocide at the hands of the Sudanese government. Starvation and persecution has driven the refugees to other parts of Sudan such as Khartoum and neighboring countries including Egypt. In early 2003, a new rebellion against the central government began in the western region of Darfur. In response to accusations of neglect from residents of Darfur, the government began arming and providing technical support to militia groups entitled the Janjaweed. The Janjaweed have been wiping out communities of Muslim African tribal farmers in a genocidal campaign. To date, about 400,000 people have been killed and nearly 2 million displaced in clashes between rebel groups and the government. Here also, refugees are fleeing for their lives, primarily to Chad 1 (228,836 refugees) and Uganda (212,857) with some 13,446 Sudanese seeking safety in Egypt. In Egypt, the situation of Sudanese refugees, both from the South and Darfur, is dire. They lack basic rights, are on the verge of starvation, and suffer from frequent harassment by the authorities. During a protest in December 2005, 27 were killed by the Egyptian police, while many others were injured. Six hundred and fifty refugees were detained while Egypt announced it planned to deport them back to Sudan. Only as a result of international pressure, was this deportation plan withdrawn. As a result of Egypt’s failure to grant Sudanese proper protection, many have decided to attempt the dangerous trek to Israel. Those lucky enough to collect the funds required by smugglers, then risk being shot and killed by the Egyptian police while crossing the border. Once in Israel, they surrender themselves to passing army patrols who arrest them as illegal aliens. Currently, about 2,500 Sudanese asylum seekers are in Israel. About 750 are survivors of genocide from the Darfur region while virtually all of the rest are Christians from South Sudan. Most of the refugees are young men however about 150 families (including approximately 400 children) and an estimated 100 unaccompanied minors (including 30 under the age of 16) are also located here.
However, the government also refuses to allow them to access the established asylum procedure. It bases its refusal on the fact that they are allegedly from an "enemy country" and therefore are presumed to be "dangerous to State security." The status of being from an "enemy nation" is inclusive; the State does not check individual cases to verify that they are actually dangerous in any way. The treatment of Sudanese in Israel contrasts with the way Israel handles asylum applications from other nationalities. Recognized refugees in Israel are released from prison and granted work and stay permits as well as social benefits. Asylum seekers whose cases are in the process of review and whose requests are not summarily denied, are similarly released and given temporary work permits. Israel's treatment of Sudanese asylum-seekers violates several bodies of international law, which Israel has signed and ratified. Human rights and refugee law (mainly grounded in the 1951 refugee convention) prohibits discrimination on the basis of national origin in asylum policies and forbids states from singling out particular nationalities for disadvantage as related to immigration. The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 requires that states exempt refugees from the measures they might otherwise take against enemy nationals. Ironically, this last provision of international humanitarian law was promoted by the young State of Israel, remembering that the UK had sheltered German Jews during World War II even though they were citizens of an enemy state.
The first arrivals were handled by the Ministry of Interior and the Immigration Authority (IA). They were detained in IA prisons under the Law of Entry to Israel as are all undocumented migrants. Because they were not being deported, the UNHCR in Israel, the Refugee Rights Clinic and the Hotline for Migrant Workers were able to release some of them to various kibbutzim in Israel. This was done on a case by case basis through an agreement reached with the Ministry of the Interior. Later, when the Ministry of Interior began to refuse their release, we successfully petitioned the Tribunal for the Review of Custody of Undocumented Migrants for their release. Some 30 asylum seekers were released in this manner.
In response, the Hotline for Migrant Workers and the Refugee Rights Clinic at Tel Aviv University filed High Court petitions against the use of the Infiltration Law in four cases. A hearing on these cases was held on May 8, 2006 and the State was ordered to provide administrative review to detained Sudanese within 30 days. To enable this, a mechanism of administrative review was enacted by the Minister of Defense and an official was assigned to conduct this task. While detainees held in Israel's central region began enjoying such review in August 2006, regular review for most of the detainees, namely those located in the far south of the country, only began in December following a request for an interim injunction submitted by the organizations. Judicial review enabled our volunteers, in collaboration with the Refugee Rights Clinic, to release many refugees who had been detained - some for over a year. They were released to alternative detention in agricultural settlements. Despite being out of prison, they were not granted work permits and technically all were still under deportation order. This arrangement limited their freedom of movement and the ability to transfer employers. Many employers exploited their weak status and lack of alternatives by offering substandard pay and living conditions. Concerned about this exploitation, the Hotline for Migrant Workers approached the Ministry of Industry, Trade and Labor requesting that employers be permitted to hire released Sudanese refugees without risking fines. In February, the Ministry approved our request and began issuing refugees letters to this effect. In March 2007, the Hotline for Migrant Workers convinced the official charged with reviewing their cases to release refugees to work at hotels in Eilat. The conditions offered by these employers were substantially better.
Voluntary groups, prominent among them a new organization entitled Assaf, attempted to fill in where the government left off. Dedicated citizens worked day and night to find short term emergency solutions for the stranded refugees. Many were subsequently placed with employers in Eilat. Because they were never detained, no restrictions were placed on their movement, rather they were granted temporary protection papers. The influx continued at a rapid pace. Between April and August 2007, approximately 1,000 refugees entered the country, with the peak period characterized by up to 50 newcomers a day. They were joined by refugees from other African countries- primarily Eritrea and the Ivory Coast. By the end of August, about 2,000 Sudanese were in Israel.
Following announcement of this new policy, on August 10th, 48 asylum seekers, including 18 children, were deported to Egypt. Despite the government's claim that Egypt had guaranteed their safety, when the UNHCR tried to track them down, such requests were denied by the Egyptian authorities. Based on testimony from a journalist, we believe that five are imprisoned in Khartoum awaiting sentencing for having entered Israel. Consequently, on August 28, 2007, together with the Refugee Rights Clinic, we submitted a High Court petition against this policy. It was first heard on September 24. At this hearing, they court ordered the State to present a procedure which would include a mechanism to distinguish between asylum seekers and others, prior to their deportation to Egypt. In early December 2007, the State presented such a procedure to the court, which we believe to be flawed as it does not allow access to the Israeli asylum system. This process of negotiation has continued into 2008.
This has been the case with newly arrived refugees. However, many groups fall through the cracks or have faced difficulties benefiting from this decision, particularly those who arrived prior to this new decision. The Hotline for Migrant Workers and the Refugee Rights Clinic represented 13 such refugees in three separate cases. In September 2007, we asked the court for a principled decision in which they will state unequivocally that holding any person according to the Law to Prevent Infiltration is illegal. We are still waiting for a ruling in this case.
On January 7th, 2008, the Hotline for Migrant Workers along with four other organizations petitioned the Supreme Court regarding this facility. We requested a substantial improvement in detention conditions and the release of children from this facility. As a result of the filing of the petition, the authorities provided detainees with additional blankets, added another layer of insulation to the tents and distributed space heaters. The court agreed that prison conditions are deficient, yet accepted the State's claim that they are working to improve them. Following the filing of this petition, voluntary organizations were no longer granted access to Ketziot. On March 6, as a result of intensive lobbying, the Hotline for Migrant Workers was granted permission to attend tribunal hearings but entry into prison wings remains off limits.
In late February, the Israeli police initiated a wide-scale program of round-ups and arrests. The Prison Service was instructed to free over 2,000 places in detention while the Ministry of Interior, police and other government agencies were to prepare for mass deportations. The operation's initiation took place on February 25 when police raided three Tel Aviv shelters and arrested 250 refugees. Some held work permits while others had temporary protection papers. In the following days, additional arrests took place in Israel's south. Most of the refugees were photographed, fingerprinted and released on the same day. Israeli citizens were not immune; three activists were also detained. The Israeli office of the UNHCR issued a strongly worded condemnation of this campaign.
The rest, including an additional 150 from Darfur, have deportation orders. None have received official work permits or are entitled to social benefits, and their right to find employers has now been called into question. Their long-term fate remains unknown with the futures of those from South Sudan being particularly in question. Although the UNHCR is examining the refugees' cases to assess options for resettlement, this process is long and resettlement is far from guaranteed.
What is the Hotline for Migrant Workers Doing? The Hotline is working with other NGOs and the Israeli government to formulate a long-term solution. We are a member of the Forum for Refugee Rights, a group of seven NGOs dedicated to promoting policy and legislation. We are also in contact with various MPs and Holocaust scholars and have agreed to publicly support the cause.
In 2008, we are continuing these activities and conducting others, among them:
We hope you will join us in these efforts.
1 All numbers are taken from the UNHCR 2006 statistical report.
|
|||||||||||||||